United States.

METHODS OF INTERPRETATION OF STATUTES AND THE RECENT TRENDS IN INTERPRETATION Vrinda Yadav, B.A. LL.B (Hons) student at UPES, School of Law, Dehradun. Mradul Prakash Agnihotri, B.A. LL.B (Hons) student at UPES, School of Law, Dehradun. Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.25 This research paper comprehensively explores the historical evolution of statutory interpretation, spanning from the Blackstonian era to the contemporary period. Emphasizing the vital role of statutory interpretation in the judiciary, the paper aims to unveil true legislative intent and deliver justice, addressing complexities, unforeseen circumstances, and linguistic ambiguities within statutes. Traditional methods such as Literal or Grammatical Interpretation, the Golden Rule, the Mischief Rule, and the Purposive Approach are scrutinized for their respective advantages and disadvantages, considering factors like alignment with legislative intent and flexibility. Recent trends in statutory interpretation, notably the recognition of compensation as a remedy for fundamental rights violations, are examined, along with the judiciary’s role in statutory interpretation through judicial review marked by judicial activism. The paper concludes by highlighting the transition from the Literal Rule to the more flexible Purposive Rule, emphasizing its efficacy in addressing logical defects and fostering justice across diverse situations. In essence, the research provides a nuanced understanding of statutory interpretation’s evolution, traditional methodologies, and contemporary trends, showcasing its dynamic and adaptive nature in the realm of judicial interpretation. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 416-436. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

DEFENDING HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING AND REFUGEE EXPLOITATION Oshin Johari, Advocate Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.24 The global refugee crisis and the proliferation of human trafficking represent two of the most pressing humanitarian challenges of our time. Often, these issues intersect, leaving refugees, already vulnerable, at heightened risk of exploitation by traffickers. This paper, titled “Trapped Between Borders: Navigating the Legal Labyrinth of Human Trafficking and Refugee Protection in International Law,” explores the intricate relationship between human trafficking and refugee flows, focusing on how current international legal frameworks address—or fail to address—the dual vulnerabilities faced by trafficked refugees. Drawing on case studies from conflict zones and regions with significant refugee movements, this paper critically examines the effectiveness of existing international instruments, such as the United Nations Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons (Palermo Protocol) and the 1951 Refugee Convention. It highlights the legal gaps and enforcement challenges that leave many trafficked refugees without adequate protection or recourse. The paper argues for a more integrated approach to international law, one that acknowledges the complex realities faced by refugees who are victims of trafficking. By proposing legal reforms and enhanced international cooperation, this study seeks to contribute to the development of more robust protections for some of the world’s most vulnerable populations, ensuring that they are not merely trapped between borders but are provided with the comprehensive support and justice they deserve. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 396-415. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

LEGAL BONDS AND BREAKS: COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVES ON MARRIAGE AND DIVORCE LAWS IN THE USA AND INDIA Jaydeep Findoria, Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.23 This is a comparative analysis of the complex legal structures surrounding marriage and divorce in the United States and India. Therefore, this research digs into the different marital arrangements recognized in both countries, procedural intricacies surrounding divorce cases, and the hurdles that come with cross-border divorces. The paper will revolve around the play of structures of law, cultural norms, and societal values against the tapestry of changing nature of matrimonial relationships and their dissolution between the two nations. Central themes discussed include issues relating to jurisdictional considerations, recognition of foreign decrees, and the legal precedents that cut across divorces across borders. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 388-395. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024