A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF EDUCATIONAL POLICIES BETWEEN US AND INDIA
Akhilesh Nilkanth Kulkarni, LLM Student (India)
This study undertakes a comparative analysis of educational policies in the United States and India, two major democratic nations with distinct socio-economic, cultural, and institutional frameworks. The research problem centers on understanding how differing policy structures, governance models, and implementation mechanisms influence educational outcomes, particularly in terms of access, quality, equity, and innovation. The study employs a doctrinal and comparative research methodology, relying primarily on qualitative analysis of key policy documents such as India’s National Education Policy 2020 and Right to Education Act 2009, and the United States’ Every Student Succeeds Act, supplemented by secondary data from government reports and international organizations. The scope of the study is limited to primary and secondary education, with selective references to higher education where relevant. It critically examines dimensions such as curriculum design, assessment frameworks, inclusivity measures, digital education policies, and regional disparities in implementation. The paper argues that while the U.S. system emphasizes decentralization, flexibility, and innovation, the Indian system has historically been more centralized, though recent reforms indicate a shift towards holistic and multidisciplinary learning. Preliminary analysis suggests that both countries face persistent challenges in bridging equity gaps and ensuring effective policy implementation, despite well-articulated frameworks. The study highlights that policy success is contingent not merely on design but on contextual adaptability, administrative capacity, and socio-economic realities. It concludes by suggesting the need for cross-learning between the two systems, particularly in areas of inclusive education, teacher training, and technology integration, to enhance overall educational outcomes.
| 📄 Type | 🔍 Information |
|---|---|
| Research Paper | LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research (LIJDLR), Volume 4, Issue 1, Page 1615–1628. |
| 🔗 Creative Commons | © Copyright |
| This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License . | © Authors, 2026. All rights reserved. |