CRIMINAL ATTRIBUTES EMERGING FROM CRIME MAPPING: A HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE
Sri Meena S, 4th semester B. A. L. L. B Student at government law college, Madurai (India)
In the 21st century, the utilization of artificial intelligence (AI) on employment, public services, surveillance significantly developed the socio-economic landscape. At the International level, cases such as the Dutch child benefits scandal and the use of the crime mapping in U.S. courts reveal serious governance failures in algorithmic decision-making. In the Indian context, the deployment of the CMAPS by the Delhi Police in the Jahangirpuri area has raised significant human rights concerns. The use of facial recognition technology has contributed to disproportionate arrests of Dalits and Muslims. In further, discriminatory recruitment algorithms in industrial AI applications such as Amazon’s hiring system, underscore issues of privacy violations, algorithmic bias, and unfair attribution. All these incidents are given clear picture about the violation of AI driven crime mapping in International and national human rights regime. Indian Constitution guarantees the human rights to protect the marginalized people from unfairness, discrimination, deprivation. From an ethical perspective, AI decision-making must be grounded in transparency, accountability, human dignity rather than merely technical preference. Through the analytical, multi-disciplinary, philosophical and humanitarian approaches, paper examines how AI governance must be anchored in ethical obligations and universal principles, highlights the requirement of human supervision on AI, challenges posed by AI-driven criminal attribution due to legal vacuum. Furthermore, the paper emphasizes that true development lies in restoring the public trust, safeguarding human rights and ensuring the remedial justice (ubi jus ibi remedium). Finally, the paper proposes remedial measures including technical safeguards, curriculum reform through awareness, and the formulation of strategic policy guidelines for effective governance.
| 📄 Type | 🔍 Information |
|---|---|
| Research Paper | LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research (LIJDLR), Volume 4, Issue 3, Page 240–259. |
| 🔗 Creative Commons | © Copyright |
| This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License . | © Authors, 2026. All rights reserved. |