LIJDLR

THE DECENTRALISATION PARADOX: COLONIAL LEGACIES AND DECOLONISING THE ADMINISTRATIVE MACHINERY IN POST-COLONIAL GOVERNANCE

Anurag Nair, B.A.LL.B/5th year/Sem.IX Student at ILNU, Nirma University (India)

Saurav, B.A.LL.B/ 5th Year/Sem.IX Student at ILNU, Nirma University (India)

This study examines why grassroots participation in democracy within post-colonial nations remains unfulfilled, arguing that although the sovereign state displaced colonial rule, it did little to alter the internal state machinery and the administrative framework it inherited. The paper combines Mahmood Mamdani’s bifurcation of the state with the institutional path-dependence models of Acemoglu, Johnson, and Robinson, in order to demonstrate how colonial institutions, created as instruments of resource extraction and social control, continue to constrain local autonomy. Treating the “Prefectoral” system, and in particular the long-standing office of the District Magistrate, as the principal obstacle to fiscal and administrative decentralisation, the research identifies a “Decentralisation Paradox”: in the majority of circumstances, modern reform concentrates upon decentralising oppression by empowering local elites rather than the common people. The analysis further employs the concept of state-driven simplification developed by James C. Scott, together with the prestige-based influence exercised within the bureaucratic field theorised by Pierre Bourdieu, Loïc Wacquant, and Samar Farage, so as to emphasise the cultural dimension of bureaucracy as the source of a colonial-like distance separating the administrator from the local citizen. Methodologically, the study adopts a qualitative, comparative-historical design, examining India and Nigeria as contrasting colonial inheritances: the meritocratic “Steel Frame” of direct administration in the former, and the neopatrimonial order produced by Indirect Rule in the latter. The paper proceeds from the architecture of colonial control, through path dependence and bureaucratic stickiness, state simplification and the legibility gap, to a comparative case study and the paradox itself. It concludes that authentic local democracy requires a decolonisation of the bureaucracy, which at present continues to treat local populations as subjects to be distrusted rather than as citizens to be trusted.

📄 Type 🔍 Information
Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research (LIJDLR), Volume 4, Issue 3, Page 2379–2406.
🔗 Creative Commons © Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License . © Authors, 2026. All rights reserved.