LIJDLR

Supreme Court of India

RIGHT TO PRIVACY, A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT: A CASE STUDY ON JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) & ANR. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS., 2017

RIGHT TO PRIVACY, A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT: A CASE STUDY ON JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) & ANR. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS., 2017 Fannana Mazumder, Student, LLM, 1st semester, IILM University, Greater Noida (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.203 Right to privacy is a complicated concept that has evolved over time and was affected by various factors. It is a multifaceted aspect which differs from person to person that seems to be easy but difficult to define. Right to privacy, in layman’s words, can be defined as the impalpable as well as physical right of any person to live freely from others’ interference or intrusion. The idea of privacy is a vague one having an intricate value. Right to privacy can also be defined as one’s freedom of choice.  The Right to Privacy is a fundamental aspect of human liberty and dignity. In India, right to privacy was recognized as a fundamental right under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution by the Supreme Court in the case of Justice K. S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) & anr. v. Union of India & ors., 2017. This case was a historic judgement that unanimously recognized Right to Privacy as a fundamental right. The historic judgement was delivered by a nine-judge bench of the Supreme Court of India in the year 2017. The case originally arose when Justice K. S. Puttaswamy, a retired judge of the Karnataka High Court via writ petition moved to Supreme Court challenging the constitutionality of the Aadhar Scheme on the grounds that it violated the citizens’ right to privacy. The primary issue in this case was that whether the right to privacy was an intrinsic part of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution and a part of the freedoms guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution.  The Supreme Court of India in its nine-judge bench unanimously delivered judgement, recognized right to privacy as a fundamental right and an intrinsic part of right to life and personal liberty guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. It was also held that right to privacy is also a part of the freedoms guaranteed under Part III of the Constitution. The Court overruled the earlier judgments in the cases of M. P. Sharma v. Satish Chandra, 1954 and Kharak Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 1964, where it was held, that right to privacy was not a fundamental right. This case emphasized that any infringement on the right to privacy must satisfy the conditions of legality, necessity and proportionality. The judgement also emphasized that privacy extends to all spheres of life including individual freedoms, data protection and sexual orientation. This historic judgement laid the groundwork in the case of Navtej Singh Johar v. Union of India, 2018 for decriminalization of homosexuality. This case was a game changer in the context of individual freedom in India marking the beginning of a historic legal battle. 

RIGHT TO PRIVACY, A FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT: A CASE STUDY ON JUSTICE K. S. PUTTASWAMY (RETD.) & ANR. V. UNION OF INDIA & ORS., 2017 Read More »

KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA: A LANDMARK IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA’S JUDICIAL PROCESS

KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA: A LANDMARK IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA’S JUDICIAL PROCESS Akansha Barua , LL.M. (Cyber Law), IILM University, Greater Noida (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.147 The judgment in Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala (1973) is widely regarded as a turning point in India’s judicial and constitutional history. Delivered by a thirteen-judge bench of the Supreme Court, this case addressed the scope of Parliament’s amending power under Article 368 of the Constitution. The central issue was whether Parliament’s authority extended to altering the very foundation and identity of the Constitution. By a narrow margin of 7:6, the Court propounded the Basic Structure Doctrine, which held that while Parliament has extensive amending powers, it cannot destroy or abrogate the essential features that form the Constitution’s identity. These include the supremacy of the Constitution, the rule of law, judicial review, democracy, secularism, separation of powers, and fundamental rights. This doctrine preserved the sanctity of the Constitution and redefined the relationship between the legislature and the judiciary by establishing the latter as the ultimate guardian of constitutional principles. The judgment was particularly significant during the Emergency period (1975–77), when democratic values and fundamental rights were under threat. It prevented the concentration of absolute power in the hands of transient parliamentary majorities, thereby safeguarding India’s democratic framework. Thus, the Kesavananda Bharati judgment not only curtailed the risks of authoritarianism but also reaffirmed the Constitution as a living document that is flexible yet firmly anchored in its core principles. It remains the cornerstone of Indian constitutional jurisprudence and the defining moment that shaped the future of judicial review and constitutionalism in India.

KESAVANANDA BHARATI V. STATE OF KERALA: A LANDMARK IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIA’S JUDICIAL PROCESS Read More »

BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE- CONSTITUTIONAL, SOCIAL, AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE

BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE- CONSTITUTIONAL, SOCIAL, AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE Dr Deepakshi Joshi, Principal, Chanakya Law College, Rudrapur, Kumaun University. Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.55 The Supreme Court of India established the Basic Structure Doctrine in the landmark judgment of Kesavananda Bharati v State of Kerala in 1973,[1] Creating a fundamental safeguard that protects the essential features of the Indian Constitution from being altered by parliamentary amendments.¹ This doctrine holds significant constitutional, social, and political implications. From a constitutional perspective, it preserves the Constitution’s fundamental identity by ensuring that core values—such as democracy, secularism, and justice—remain inviolable notwithstanding legislative changes. Socially, it affirms the protection of citizens’ fundamental rights and freedoms, thereby playing a vital role in upholding social justice and equality. Politically, the doctrine strengthens the system of checks and balances through judicial review, thus securing the democratic framework of governance. Overall, this principle has profoundly influenced the shaping of India’s democratic ideals, the protection of individual rights, and the maintenance of the balance of power between the judiciary and legislature.  

BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE- CONSTITUTIONAL, SOCIAL, AND POLITICAL SIGNIFICANCE Read More »

VIOLATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH RIGHTS OF MIGRANT WORKERS

VIOLATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH RIGHTS OF MIGRANT WORKERS Shilpee Ghosh, Student at Narsee Monjee Institute Of Management Studies, Banaglore. Download Manuscript ABSTRACT India, a nation of 29 states and 7 UTs, is well renowned for its diversity and unity, however, these qualities also have certain flaws due to the country’s failure to uphold them. The Constitution states that no discrimination should be made on the grounds of sex, colour, religion, and place of birth, everyone should be treated equally. However, the same effort is futile when it comes to migrant workers who face discrimination in some areas when they move for employment. The rights of migrant workers continue to be infringed despite numerous pieces of legislation, constitutional clauses, and governmental initiatives. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume I, Issue II, Page 240 – 266. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2023 Recent content VIOLATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH RIGHTS OF MIGRANT WORKERS UNRAVELLING ‘LOSS OF CONFIDENCE’- AN IN-DEPTH ANALYSIS OF RUDRESHA V. MANAGEMENT OF M/S TVS MOTOR COMPANY IMPACT OF ADMINISTRATIVE MALPRACTICES ON THE BUREAUCRATIC MORALITY OF INDIA: A STUDY ONLINE MEDICAL NEGLIGENCE UNDER CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT, 2019 THE KEY IMPLICATION OF SECTION 29A IN CORPORATE INSOLVENCY RESOLUTION PROCESS EXPLORING THE NEED FOR A POST-WTO FRAMEWORK

VIOLATION OF SOCIAL SECURITY AND HEALTH RIGHTS OF MIGRANT WORKERS Read More »