LIJDLR

THE REGULATORY CONUNDRUM: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE DIGITAL PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT, 2023, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIAN STARTUPS

THE REGULATORY CONUNDRUM: A MULTIDIMENSIONAL ANALYSIS OF THE DIGITAL PERSONAL DATA PROTECTION ACT, 2023, AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR INDIAN STARTUPS

Parul Shukla, Law Centre II, University of Delhi.

The Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 (DPDP Act), marks India’s first comprehensive data protection legislation, reaffirming the constitutional right to privacy as upheld in K.S. Puttaswamy v. Union of India (2017). This paper employs a multidimensional analytical framework encompassing political, social, economic, technological, environmental, and legal (PSETEL) lenses to evaluate the Act’s implications on India’s startup ecosystem, particularly data-intensive sectors such as SaaS, health-tech, ed-tech, and fintech. Politically, while aligning with global benchmarks like the GDPR, the Act asserts digital sovereignty through the creation of the Data Protection Board of India, which wields enforcement and adjudicatory powers under Section 27, thus balancing innovation incentives under Section 17(1)(e) with concerns of potential executive overreach. Socially, the Act enhances data principal rights, including informed consent, correction, and erasure, expected to improve consumer trust, though requirements like verifiable parental consent (Section 9) may affect user acquisition strategies, especially in ed-tech sectors. Economically, compliance costs are projected to increase by 7–10% for early-stage startups due to obligations such as appointing Data Protection Officers and conducting Data Protection Impact Assessments, with non-compliance penalties extending up to Rs. 250 Crores under Schedule I. Technologically, the Act necessitates system-wide changes in data processing and architecture to meet principles of data minimization and purpose limitation, though its regulatory silence on AI and ML raises compliance ambiguities. Environmentally, data localization mandates could elevate energy demands through the expansion of domestic data centers, albeit offset partially by sustainable data minimization practices. Legally, the Act’s extraterritorial scope (Section 3), mandatory breach reporting (Section 8), and amendments to the RTI Act create regulatory uncertainties and increase administrative burdens, particularly for cross-border operations. Despite these challenges, the Act presents opportunities for startups to differentiate themselves through ethical data stewardship, thereby aligning with India’s ambition of achieving a USD 1 trillion digital economy by 2030.

📄 Type 🔍 Information
Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research (LIJDLR), Volume 3, Issue 2, Page 947–958.
🔗 Creative Commons © Copyright
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License . © Authors, 2025. All rights reserved.