The philosophy of Karma is a universal and timeless concept rooted in ancient Indian traditions, indexing the principles of action, intention, and consequence, which lay the foundation for the justice system. This paper examines the philosophy of Karma as a moral framework of action, intention, and consequence, and explores its parallels with the modern legal justice system. The research aims to examine how the Karmic notion of accountability and impartial justice aligns with constitutional principles, including equality before the law, natural justice, and reformative punishment. Methodologically, the paper adopts a doctrinal approach, relying on primary sources from Vedic literature and judicial decisions, along with secondary commentary from legal scholarship.

The study finds that while Karma operates as a universal and moral law of causation, its principles are reflected in the corrective, restorative, and retributive functions of modern legal systems. Case law analysis, including Vishaka v. State of Rajasthan, Mohd. Giasuddin v. State of Andhra Pradesh and Brown v. Board of Education demonstrate how courts embody the spirit of karmic justice by ensuring fairness, accountability, and opportunities for redemption. The paper concludes that integrating karmic philosophy into legal discourse can enrich contemporary jurisprudence by aligning law with ethical responsibility and universal values.