LIJDLR

Volume II Issue III

WITNESS PROTECTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG USA, UK, FRANCE, AND INDIA

WITNESS PROTECTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG USA, UK, FRANCE, AND INDIA Priyanka. C, Tamil Nadu Dr. Ambedkar Law University- School of Excellence in Law Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.18 “Whenever a man commits a crime, heaven finds a witness”                                                                                              –  Edward G. Bulwer The above statement shows the importance of witness in any criminal justice system. The role of witness in the criminal justice administration is extremely inevitable especially in an adversarial system where the burden of proof is on the prosecution and the prosecution depends on the witness and their statements. There are instances where witnesses had turned hostile and refused to help in finding the guilty of the accused person resulting in the acquittal of the accused who may have been guilty of charges. This poses threat to society because the question arises why witness has turned hostile or why they had not come forward in the first place to give evidence and perform their sacred duty of helping the justice system. When a person is to testify against a criminal particularly those having political, financial and man power to cause harm, they fear for their well-being and fail to fulfil their ethical duty to support the truth. Thus, the governments across the world recognised the need to protect witness to ensure the delivery of justice and enacted witness protection programmes. The study of witness protection programs in the US, UK, France, and India reveals significant differences in structures, implementation, and effectiveness, despite varying protection and resource allocation. This article highlights the development of witness protection programmes in United States, United Kingdom, France, and India. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 299-315. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

WITNESS PROTECTION: A COMPARATIVE STUDY AMONG USA, UK, FRANCE, AND INDIA Read More »

LEGAL RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: EFFICACY AND CHALLENGES

LEGAL RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: EFFICACY AND CHALLENGES Prithwish Ganguli, Advocate ,LLM, MA (Sociology), MA (CL & FS) Dip in Cyber Law, Dip in Psychology Faculty Member, Heritage Law College, Kolkata Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.17 Domestic violence remains a pervasive issue worldwide, affecting individuals across all socio-economic backgrounds. This paper examines the efficacy and challenges of legal responses to domestic violence, focusing on the effectiveness of existing laws, enforcement mechanisms, and support systems. Despite significant progress in enacting legislation aimed at protecting victims, numerous obstacles persist in ensuring justice and safety. These include cultural barriers, inadequate law enforcement training, and gaps in victim support services. The paper also explores the role of legal reforms, community involvement, and interdisciplinary approaches in enhancing the effectiveness of legal responses to domestic violence. By analysing case studies and legal frameworks from different jurisdictions, this paper seeks to highlight the complexities involved in addressing domestic violence and propose strategies for more comprehensive and effective legal interventions. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 279-298. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

LEGAL RESPONSES TO DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: EFFICACY AND CHALLENGES Read More »

AI IN CONTRACT LAW: NAVIGATING LEGAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE DIGITAL ERA

AI IN CONTRACT LAW: NAVIGATING LEGAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE DIGITAL ERA Saad Misbah, Law student at Jamia Millia Islamia University Inaya Imtiyaz, BBA student at Indira Gandhi National Open University Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.16 The use of Artificial Intelligence in contract law has had a profound change in the process of contract formation and enforcement. Thus, this research paper explores the dynamic nature of the adoption of AI in the context of contract law and specifically within the Indian legal system. Beginning with the historical evolution of contract law in India, the paper highlights the shift from manual to advanced AI-based approaches. AI has progressed basic automation tools to sophisticated systems for tasks such as like writing, negotiating, and reviewing contracts. With the rise of smart contracts, particularly those propelled by Artificial intelligence, questions arise regarding their enforceability as contract, consent between the parties, and liability issues. The research focuses on the issues of enforceability of contracts concluded with the assistance of artificial intelligence, including the legal recognition of artificial intelligence as a contracting party and the legal validity of the contracts concluded with the use of artificial intelligence. It also considers distribution of liability in AI-assisted contracts, looking at how blame is apportioned where AI is implicated in contract violation. Furthermore, the paper compares national and international jurisdictions to illustrate the landscape of AI-related contractual disputes and potential legal outcomes. The paper concludes by analyzing the prospects and implications of Artificial Intelligence in the field of contract law. It emphasizes the need for changes in legal rules related to AI, ethical considerations, and judicial adaptations necessary to address AI-related issues. The consideration of AI in contract law emphasizes the necessity for legal innovations while AI requiring legal reforms that promote justice and fairness in contractual relationships. This paper provides a comprehensive analysis of how AI is progressively integrating into the legal framework of contract law and identifies key areas for further research and application. In this research, we utilized a qualitative approach, conducting a thorough review of literature, case laws, and legal frameworks to assess the impact of AI on contract law and explore emerging legal challenges. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 264-278. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

AI IN CONTRACT LAW: NAVIGATING LEGAL CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES IN THE DIGITAL ERA Read More »

THE ROAD TO MEDIATION

THE ROAD TO MEDIATION Raghvi Garg, Asian Law College (CCS University) Nidhi Adwani, Asian Law College (CCS University) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.15 “An ounce of mediation is worth a pound of arbitration and a ton of litigation.”[1]                                                                                      By providing a successful substitute for conventional litigation, mediation considerably lessens the workload on courts by lowering the number of cases that need to be heard by judges. Mediation reduces the amount of time it takes to settle disagreements and clears the backlog of cases by settling conflicts outside of court. Courts can concentrate their resources on more complicated or contentious cases that call for formal adjudication because of this decrease in the caseload. Furthermore, the generally shorter and less expensive mediation procedure not only leads to quicker results but also lowers the total cost of litigation, which lessens the burden on the court’s resources. Through mediation, the parties are able to re-evaluate their rights and shared interests and develop fresh approaches to conflict resolution. As a result, among arbitration, conciliation, and negotiation, mediation has emerged as the most popular alternative dispute resolution (ADR) process. Mediation is seen as a legitimate means of resolving disputes. It is currently used in many different contexts, such as individual disagreements, employer-employee disputes, and family circumstances like divorce and custody issues. Global mediation also takes place, involving intervention in disputes between nations and in nations where the ruling class is at odds with its citizens. Mediation has been known to positively and permanently alter people, and in the process, its relationships. The purpose of this research is to examine mediation’s function in the legal system as a successful and practical form of dispute resolution. The primary goals of the study are to determine how integrated mediation affects District Court proceedings and to introduce mediators as impartial third parties who aid in settlement negotiations. Additionally, this study intends to investigate potential difficulties and obstacles in putting mediation into practice in a cutthroat setting. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 242-263. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

THE ROAD TO MEDIATION Read More »

FROM PROHIBITION TO ENFORCEMENT: UNDERSTANDING LEGAL INTRICACIES IN THE NDPS ACT, 1985

FROM PROHIBITION TO ENFORCEMENT: UNDERSTANDING LEGAL INTRICACIES IN THE NDPS ACT, 1985 Mahendra Soni, Assistant Prof. (Sr. Scale) NLIU Bhopal. Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.14 The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances (NDPS) Act of 1985 was enacted to address the growing challenges posed by illicit drug use in India. The NDPS Act categorizes various narcotic drugs and psychotropic substances, detailing the penalties associated with offenses, which can range from fines to capital punishment depending on the severity of the crime. The Act of 1985 also contains specific provisions pertaining to licensing and regulatory measures for the cultivation, production, and distribution of these substances for legitimate medical and scientific purposes. This research paper provides a descriptive and thorough analysis of the substantial provisions of the NDPS Act, and an endeavor has been made by the author to analytically review the enforcement mechanism provided under the Act with the help of evolving jurisprudence in the matters involving drug contraband. The paper highlights the dual need for strict control to prevent abuse and misuse while ensuring the availability of these substances for legitimate medical and scientific purposes. This paper addresses significant challenges in drug law enforcement, including corruption and inadequate resources, and suggests potential reforms to create more effective and equitable drug policies that prioritize public health and social justice in India. Furthermore, the research also points out the existing gaps in the statutory provisions and enforcement strategies with suggestive measures to take them. The paper concludes by emphasizing the importance of revising the NDPS Act to better address the complexities of drug policy reform and its implications for these communities. This research aims to contribute to the ongoing discourse on drug policy in India, advocating for a balanced approach that considers both enforcement and policy shift in matters of NDPS Act. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 217-241. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

FROM PROHIBITION TO ENFORCEMENT: UNDERSTANDING LEGAL INTRICACIES IN THE NDPS ACT, 1985 Read More »

CAN INDIAN PRISONS REPLICATE THE NORWEGIAN PRISON SYSTEM? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MODEL PRISON MANUAL 2023 AND THE NORWEGIAN PRISON POLICY

CAN INDIAN PRISONS REPLICATE THE NORWEGIAN PRISON SYSTEM? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MODEL PRISON MANUAL 2023 AND THE NORWEGIAN PRISON POLICY Sridhar S, B.A.LL. B(Hons), School of Excellence in Law, TNDALU Karpaga Vinayagam, B.C.A.LL. B(Hons), School of Excellence in Law, TNDALU Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.13 Recidivism in India had been a major issue over a period of time, which is a direct cause of failed Indian prison policy. Indian prisons are characterized by features of overcrowding, poor management, harsh living conditions, and human rights violations. In contrast, Norwegian prisons meet and set international standards in prison policy in the global arena. Norwegian prisons are recognized by interests in rehabilitation of inmates, societal reintegration, and a humane approach to prisoners. As a result, recidivism in Norway has decreased steadily, and it also had a positive impact on the economy of the nation. The aspects and effects of the incarceration system of Norway are elucidated in this study. Indian prisons are governed by old colonial laws, which makes the prison system more complicated in India. The Union government notifies the states with model prison manuals for the governance of jails. This study describes the aspects of the Model Prison Manual 2023 and aims to predict the effectiveness of the recent prison manual. The model prison manual 2023 has some inspirations from the Norwegian prison system, which is added to make the reformative system of justice effective in India. The addition of the policies is an appreciable step forward in the administration of justice, but the question of the applicability of these policies in Indian prisons is inevitable. This study analyses the possibilities of implementing successful policies of Norway in Indian prisons and the challenges in implementing identical policies. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 206-216. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

CAN INDIAN PRISONS REPLICATE THE NORWEGIAN PRISON SYSTEM? A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS BETWEEN MODEL PRISON MANUAL 2023 AND THE NORWEGIAN PRISON POLICY Read More »

WORDS OF JUSTICE: LITERARY ENGAGEMENTS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES AND DEBATES

WORDS OF JUSTICE: LITERARY ENGAGEMENTS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES AND DEBATES Nikita Gomdani, Student at Manipal University Jaipur Rajasthan. Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.12 “Words of Justice: Literary Engagements with Constitutional Principles and Debates” delves into the complex relationship that exists between constitutional principles and literary works, which serve as the foundation of society. It examines how literary works make constitutional arguments more relevant by setting impersonal legal issues in familiar settings. Among these core ideas are the legal narrative, the language understanding of the law, and the connections between the law and society. The paper examines the rationales behind the traditional methods of connecting literature and law, such as the development of legal interpretation, the enhancement of court decisions, and the progress of the legal system and attorneys. Numerous conclusions drawn from the combined examination of the law and literature apply to real-world problems and go beyond “mere” theory. It could potentially be argued that the legal system softens and humanizes its language by referencing works of literature. By using literary methods and organizing them in accordance with the patterns created by socially aware writing, it integrates itself into these paradigms. This study analyses literary works to investigate how Indian courts have lately defined and interpreted rights in relation to constitutional law concerns. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 186-205. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

WORDS OF JUSTICE: LITERARY ENGAGEMENTS WITH CONSTITUTIONAL PRINCIPLES AND DEBATES Read More »

APPLICATION OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE TO CONTEMPORARY ISSUES: A FOCUS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW

APPLICATION OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE TO CONTEMPORARY ISSUES: A FOCUS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW Sathiyanathan S, Student at Symbiosis Law School, Noida Elamathy S, Student at School of Excellence in Law, TNDALU, Tamil Nadu Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.11 The Constitution of India, being the “mother law of the land,” is framed by the founding fathers with keeping in soul the parent patria concept to fetch the utmost good to its citizens (children). No other law of the land other than the constitution shall be supreme. Such a supreme power – our constitution adjusts itself and allows us to make alterations to run in parallel with our dynamic societal changes. Yet, some portions of the constitution should be touched to make any kind of alterations as it withholds the constitution as a basic pillar, as a balancing block, and so on to preserve the main purpose of the constitution. Such a static strong portion is called the name, “Basic structure of the Constitution.” The concept was evolved in the many yesteryears, and through theories by eminent jurists and various precedents, it came into the contemporary shape to be called the doctrine of basic structure or doctrine of constitutionally controlled governance. There are various characteristic traits which fit in the purse of basic structure. And one such significant and paramount basic structure is the judicial review. In this article, we will know about the basics of basic structure, its origin, elements, its application with the contemporary issues, precedents which withheld those, judicial review, its relevance with stability and in synchronization with the basic structure with the relevant constitutional amendments and the contemporary tug of battle between the enacting and the interpretation wings of the Government. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 164-185. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

APPLICATION OF BASIC STRUCTURE DOCTRINE TO CONTEMPORARY ISSUES: A FOCUS ON JUDICIAL REVIEW Read More »

THE ECONOMICS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: BALANCING INNOVATION AND MARKET COMPETITION

THE ECONOMICS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: BALANCING INNOVATION AND MARKET COMPETITION Arpita Gupta, Student (Pursuing LL.M.) from Gujarat National Law University, Gandhinagar Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.10 This research paper examines the economics of intellectual property rights (IPR) in India and the challenges of balancing innovation and market competition in the country. Intellectual property rights play a crucial role in promoting innovation and promoting market competition. However, finding the right balance between these two goals is crucial for sustainable economic growth. The article begins with an overview of intellectual property rights, including copyright, patents, and trademarks, and their economic significance. It examines the historical development of intellectual property in India and its impact on innovation and competition. The legal framework and institutions governing intellectual property in India are analyzed, focusing on key intellectual property laws such as the Copyright Act, the Patent Act, and the Trademark Act. Explore the strengths and weaknesses of India’s intellectual property system to understand its effectiveness in supporting innovation and promoting fair competition in the marketplace. The purpose of the case studies was to illustrate specific issues related to intellectual property rights in India, such as the pharmaceutical and software industries, as well as issues related to traditional knowledge. An Assessment of the Economic Impact of Intellectual Property Rights on Innovation and Market Competition in India Using Empirical Analysis. The paper presents policy considerations and recommendations to address India’s challenges in striking a balance between protecting intellectual property and promoting competition. Conduct an assessment of the current IP policy and identify areas for improvement in order to create an effective and balanced IP system. In conclusion, this study highlights the importance of striking the right balance between intellectual property rights, innovation, and market competition in India. Achieving this balance will foster the development of a thriving innovation ecosystem while ensuring equal access to knowledge and promoting healthy competition. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 141-163. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

THE ECONOMICS OF INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS: BALANCING INNOVATION AND MARKET COMPETITION Read More »

PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES IN INDIA: EXPLORING THE IMPERATIVE FOR CODIFICATION AND A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE WITH AUSTRALIA

PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES IN INDIA: EXPLORING THE IMPERATIVE FOR CODIFICATION AND A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE WITH AUSTRALIA Prakriti Dutta, 3rd year BALLB(H), Symbiosis Law School, Pune Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2024.v02.9 “Parliamentary privilege is not a cloak for fraud.” – Lord Denning Is it really necessary to grant special privileges to those who represent, serve, and govern the people? This is arguably the most critical question in the history of democracy. Why should we grant special rights to politicians in their capacities as representatives is a subject that has been posed all across the world? The term “parliamentary privileges” refers to the specific rights and protections afforded to members of parliament; this question becomes highly pertinent. This study digs into the complex world of parliamentary privileges, looking at their development across time and current problems. It gives a thorough analysis of these advantages within the Indian legal system, covering their reach, their immunities, and the precarious balance between accountability and immunity. The research reveals different approaches to parliamentary privileges in various democratic systems through a comparative lens with Australia. The study fervently supports the codification of privileges as a revolutionary step towards enhancing accountability, transparency, and efficient governance. To eloquently depict the complex challenges legislators face while juggling their advantages in the face of the demand for responsible behaviour, a captivating Indian case study is explored. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue III, Page 118-140. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

PARLIAMENTARY PRIVILEGES IN INDIA: EXPLORING THE IMPERATIVE FOR CODIFICATION AND A COMPARATIVE PERSPECTIVE WITH AUSTRALIA Read More »