LIJDLR

Volume IV Special Issue I

DIGITAL AFTERLIVES OF ASPIRING ACTORS IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE

DIGITAL AFTERLIVES OF ASPIRING ACTORS IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Ishpreet Singh, Research Scholar at Himachal Pradesh National Law University Shimla (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v4sil.02 By making it possible to extract and repurpose human performances outside of their original context, generative artificial intelligence has radically changed the lifecycle of creative expression. This study explores the mostly undetectable phenomena of aspiring actors’ digital afterlives, concentrating on poor performances, erased show reels, and rejected auditions that are nonetheless used as training data by AI systems. When incorporated into generative AI models that can mimic voice, facial emotions, and body gestures, such performances gain substantial economic and technological value even though they do not have much artistic or commercial value in the conventional cinema and theatre sectors. The paper makes the case that Indian copyright law, namely the Indian Copyright Act, 1957, excludes aspiring actors whose artistic expressions fall outside of conventional production structures by conceptualizing artists’ rights through the lens of market success and recognized performances. This results in a regulatory gap whereby unsuccessful or abandoned performances are technologically exploitable but not legally protected. These digital traces’ continued existence creates serious issues with consent, dignity, informational self-determination, and the right to be forgotten—issues that India’s current data protection and intellectual property laws are ill-suited to handle. It argues that a type of post-performance exploitation, in which creative labor survives its rejection but not its author, is made possible by the law’s inability to acknowledge the ongoing legal relevance of unsuccessful performances. The article’s conclusion advocates for a rethinking of performers’ rights that takes into consideration the ongoing digital presence of artistic expression, regardless of commercial or artistic success.

DIGITAL AFTERLIVES OF ASPIRING ACTORS IN THE AGE OF GENERATIVE ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE Read More »

DIGITAL IDENTITY PROTECTION IN THE ERA OF AI AND DEEPFAKES

DIGITAL IDENTITY PROTECTION IN THE ERA OF AI AND DEEPFAKES Adv. Nivedita Pandey, 3rd Semester, LLM in Intellectual Property Rights, student at KES’ Shri Jayatilal H. Patel Law College, Independent Advocate practicing at Bombay High Court and Metropolitan Magistrates courts in Mumbai (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v4sil.01 In a world heading towards a growing trend in obligation to have an online presence whether for the purpose of business or being a professional influencer, a sudden spike in cyber-crimes related to data identity theft with the aid of AI and Deepfakes have become prevalent. Identity of a person is attached to their reputation and dignity in the society, however, this element of a person’s being is being blatantly tarnished for selfish motives by certain individuals. This paper examines the difficulties faced by the government as well as the people in protecting their Digital Identities, the threats posed by the circulation of Deepfakes, the disparity existing between the celebrities and the non-celebrities in effectively finding a remedy against their Identity Theft and protecting their right to privacy as enshrined in Article 21 of Indian Constitution in intersection with the post mortem privacy aspect. It critically examines the global laws of various countries in terms of their effectiveness and swiftness in protecting the identity of their citizens against the Deepfakes with the special focus on Denmark’s historic proposal to amend its Copyright law in order to avail its citizens the right to protect their Personal Identity under the same. The legislation, which is still under consideration, if passed, will allow an individual to have complete legal ownership of their Personal Identity. The study concludes by suggesting how Denmark’s proposal can be used as a global model to bring about a change in the International IPR laws in protecting Digital Identity.

DIGITAL IDENTITY PROTECTION IN THE ERA OF AI AND DEEPFAKES Read More »