LIJDLR

admissibility.

ADMISSIBILITY AND IRRELEVANCY OF CONFESSIONS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS

ADMISSIBILITY AND IRRELEVANCY OF CONFESSIONS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS Gautam Gupta, Assistant Professor of Law, Dharmashastra National Law University, Jabalpur (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v04.271 The law of confessions has a very prominent existence in the jurisprudence of evidence at the intersection of effective criminal prosecution and constitutional protection against self-incrimination. This paper makes an attempt for a critical examination of framework governing the relevancy, admissibility and irrelevancy of confessions under the laws governing the same. The term ‘confession’ is not defined in the statutory framework but is generally understood as an admission or acknowledgment of guilt by the accused. This paper attempts to unpack, through judicial pronouncements, the conceptual distinction concerning what qualifies as a confession  and whether it has been made voluntarily or involuntarily.The paper further discusses the evidentiary value accorded to a confession made by a co-accused jointly tried for the same offence, examining Section 24 of the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which corresponds to Section 30 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and the settled position that such confession is not substantive evidence and cannot, without independent corroboration, form the sole basis of conviction.  The paper further makes an attempt to discuss when the confessional statement becomes irrelevant when it is caused by inducement threat or promise being made from a person in authority and such confessional statements becomes irrelevant as they may not reflect the accused free will. On the other hand, a confessional statement made to a police officer cannot be proved against the accused, although it may be logically relevant, because it is legally inadmissible. The paper further makes an attempt to analsye the “doctrine of confirmation by subsequent facts” and to what extent it can be made admissible under the law of evidence with the other statements being recorded by the police under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.The researcher through this paper attempts to find out the impact of and the effect of involuntary statements made by an accused. The paper is confined only to find out the admissibility and irrelevancy of confessions under the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023.

ADMISSIBILITY AND IRRELEVANCY OF CONFESSIONS: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS Read More »

DYING DECLARATION: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE

DYING DECLARATION: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE Ankit Kumar Yadav, 2nd Semester student pursuing LL.M (one year) at Central university of south Bihar (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v04.109 Dying declarations have a distinct and crucial place in criminal law, playing as an exception to hearsay evidence. it provides vital insights into the cause and circumstances behind a person’s death, often it is becoming key evidence in cases where the victim is unavailable or can’t be called to testify. It is based on the principle that a person facing imminent death is unlikely to lie. dying declaration are recognized across worldwide., in India it is codified under the Section 26(a) Bhartiya Sakshya Adhiniyam,2023 dying declaration carry significant weight and importance, that make it more admissible and reliable. Issues related to dying declaration are such as the declarant’s mental and physical condition, the potential for coercion, inconsistencies in statements, and the absence of cross-examination posing unique hurdles for the judicial system. This study examines and deals with the legal framework, evidentiary value, procedural requirements, and comparative perspectives of dying declarations, focusing and highlighting both their strengths and the precautions necessary to maintain fairness and justice in criminal trials.

DYING DECLARATION: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE Read More »

LEGAL STATUS OF AI-GENERATED EVIDENCE IN INDIAN COURTS

LEGAL STATUS OF AI-GENERATED EVIDENCE IN INDIAN COURTS Vansh Srivastava, Student at Amity University, Lucknow Campus, Uttar Pradesh (India) Dr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Associate Professor at Amity University, Lucknow Campus, Uttar Pradesh (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v04.102 The swift progression of Artificial Intelligence has changed the character of evidence in judicial proceedings. AI-generated content, including deepfake videos, synthetic audio, and AI-made digital content, poses serious and new challenges to the basic rules of admissibility, authenticity, and reliability of evidence. Although Indian law has been updated through the Bharatiya Sakshya Adhiniyam, 2023, which formally acknowledges electronic records as evidence, it does not specifically deal with the unique problems of AI-generated content. This paper looks at how Indian courts can deal with this problem before it gets worse. This paper examines the legal position of AI-generated evidence before Indian courts by looking at existing laws, court decisions and legal rules on electronic evidence. It also studies the challenges created by such evidence, including difficulties in authentication, the widely discussed “black box” problem of AI systems, break in chain of custody, and the potential for deliberate misuse. A comparative study of approaches adopted in jurisdictions such as the United States, the European Union, and the United Kingdom is conducted to identify international best practices. The paper argues that the existing Indian legal framework is not equipped to handle the specific dangers of AI-generated evidence and calls for clear changes, including explicit statutory recognition, better verification methods, required disclosure rules, and training for judges and courts. The study concludes that while AI can genuinely help justice, its uncontrolled use can destroy the very idea of truth that courts depend on.

LEGAL STATUS OF AI-GENERATED EVIDENCE IN INDIAN COURTS Read More »