LIJDLR

Internet Shutdowns

RIGHT TO INTERNET ACCESS: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE IN THE DIGITAL AGE

RIGHT TO INTERNET ACCESS: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE IN THE DIGITAL AGE Gautam Kumar Mahto, Phd Scholar at Radha Govind University, Ramgarh, Jharkhand (India) Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2026.v04.252 In the digital age, access to the Internet has become central to the effective enjoyment of constitutional freedoms and human rights. This paper examines whether Internet access should be recognised as an independent fundamental right or as a derivative right that enables the exercise of existing rights such as freedom of speech and expression, education, privacy, trade, access to information, and democratic participation. The study adopts a doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, relying on constitutional provisions, judicial decisions, international human rights instruments, United Nations resolutions, policy documents, and scholarly literature. It also considers comparative developments in selected jurisdictions to understand how different legal systems have approached digital connectivity and Internet-related rights. The paper finds that although the Indian Constitution does not expressly guarantee a right to Internet access, judicial interpretation has increasingly linked Internet access with Articles 19 and 21. Decisions such as Anuradha Bhasin v. Union of India and Faheema Shirin R.K. v. State of Kerala demonstrate that Internet connectivity is constitutionally significant for speech, profession, education, and privacy. At the international level, United Nations human rights standards affirm that rights protected offline must also be protected online and condemn arbitrary disruptions of access to information. The paper further argues that Internet shutdowns must satisfy the tests of legality, necessity, proportionality, and reasonableness. It concludes that meaningful, affordable, and non-discriminatory Internet access is no longer a mere technological convenience but an essential condition for dignity, equality, democratic participation, access to public services, and inclusive development in contemporary modern society.

RIGHT TO INTERNET ACCESS: A CONSTITUTIONAL AND HUMAN RIGHTS PERSPECTIVE IN THE DIGITAL AGE Read More »

RECALIBRATING FREE SPEECH IN INDIA’S DIGITAL AGE: BALANCING EXPRESSION, NATIONAL INTEGRITY AND THE GLOBAL DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES

RECALIBRATING FREE SPEECH IN INDIA’S DIGITAL AGE: BALANCING EXPRESSION, NATIONAL INTEGRITY AND THE GLOBAL DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES Anshu Gupta, BALLB (1st Year), Banaras Hindu University Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.68 In the digital age, India is witnessing an intensifying clash between constitutional free speech protections and state-imposed restrictions rooted in national security concerns and digital nationalism. On the one hand, Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution guarantees freedom of speech, while on the other hand, emerging norms of “digital nationalism” have prompted increasingly broad censorship laws, as reflected in the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which, while omitting IPC Section 124A (sedition) but introduces Section 152 – a broader framework penalizing threats to national sovereignty and integrity. India’s evolving digital speech regime through the lens of national case law and law is in contrast with liberal-democratic models abroad. This paper examines India’s current framework – Article 19’s reasonable restrictions, the IT Act and 2021 IT Rules, especially intermediary due diligence and traceability requirements – and the key Supreme Court decisions from Ramesh Thappar to Shreya Singhal and Anuradha Bhasin.  Along with this backdrop, the paper comprises international norms like UDHR Art. 19, ICCPR Art. 19, ECHR + NetzDG, which handle speech limits. Exploring digital nationalism in India, for example, coordinated online trolling by political operatives and frequent internet shutdowns and their chilling effects on journalism and dissent. Finally, recommendations and reforms adopting formal proportionality review, ensuring transparency of takedown orders and creating an independent digital rights oversight body. By drawing on comparative jurisprudence, the paper argues India can safeguard democratic values and lead globally in balancing speech freedom with legitimate state interests.

RECALIBRATING FREE SPEECH IN INDIA’S DIGITAL AGE: BALANCING EXPRESSION, NATIONAL INTEGRITY AND THE GLOBAL DEMOCRATIC CHALLENGES Read More »