LIJDLR

Right to Health

MENSTRUAL HEALTH UNDER THE EXPANSIVE CANOPY OF RIGHTS: A CRITICAL LEGAL APPRAISAL OF THE INDIAN FRAMEWORK

MENSTRUAL HEALTH UNDER THE EXPANSIVE CANOPY OF RIGHTS: A CRITICAL LEGAL APPRAISAL OF THE INDIAN FRAMEWORK Kritanjali Purkayastha, LL.M (Human Rights Law) (Postgraduate) Department of Law, Tezpur University, India Download Manuscript doi.org/10.70183/lijdlr.2025.v03.83 Health is a fundamental human right essential for human dignity and survival, impacting an individual’s ability to live a meaningful life. Among the various dimensions of health, menstrual health, a critical aspect of reproductive health, has historically been stigmatized and neglected in public discourse due to cultural taboos and social norms. As awareness around health rights grows, the recognition of menstrual health as a fundamental human right has become more pressing. The International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, Universal Declaration on Human Rights, and other international instruments explore the significance of menstruation, analyzing how it is intertwined with the broader human rights framework, particularly the right to health. Through case laws such as “CESC Ltd. v. Subhash Chandra Bose” and “Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India”, the Indian judiciary has expanded the interpretation of the right to life to encompass health, including the right to medical care and a dignified life. Despite the increased awareness, there are still a lot of gaps in the laws and policies about menstrual health in India and around the world. This research also looks at issues affecting menstrual health rights, new legislative initiatives, and other relevant topics. It draws attention to the ways that systematic neglect is exacerbated by a lack of awareness, period poverty, inadequate infrastructure, and an unclear legal framework. This research highlights the pressing need for legal clarity, judicial recognition, and efficient policy execution by placing menstrual health within the larger human rights discourse. Ultimately, this paper advocates for a rights-based approach to menstrual health, which not only addresses the medical aspects but also integrates cultural, economic, and social dimensions to combat stigma, ensure equality, and protect dignity for all menstruators.

MENSTRUAL HEALTH UNDER THE EXPANSIVE CANOPY OF RIGHTS: A CRITICAL LEGAL APPRAISAL OF THE INDIAN FRAMEWORK Read More »

HUMAN GENOME EDITING VIS-À-VIS RIGHT TO HEALTH

HUMAN GENOME EDITING VIS-À-VIS RIGHT TO HEALTH Kajal Kamal Kishore Bang, Third year student pursuing BBA LLB Hons. from Jindal Global University. Download Manuscript ABSTRACT The paper explores the feasibility and ethical considerations of using gene editing to improve health outcomes, emphasizing the broader context of the Right to Health. It delves into the complex dynamics between gene editing technology and this fundamental right, highlighting the impact on future generations’ health. The author contends that while gene editing could offer significant health benefits, such as the eradication of genetic diseases, it also poses risks to autonomy, privacy, and data security. These risks are particularly significant when considering the potential violation of personal rights in light of right to health, if the technology is misused. Gene editing holds the potential to revolutionize medicine, but it raises profound moral, legal, and ethical questions that science alone cannot answer. Society bears the responsibility of addressing these issues through robust legal frameworks and comprehensive research to ensure that human rights are not compromised. The paper argues that while the allure of disease-free offspring is compelling, this must be balanced against the need for safeguards to protect health as a fundamental right. In light of these considerations, the author advocates for a careful, regulated approach to gene editing, with laws and ethical guidelines that account for both the benefits and the potential harm. Type Information Research Paper LawFoyer International Journal of Doctrinal Legal Research, Volume II, Issue I, Page 479-489. Creative Commons Copyright This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. Copyright © LIJDLR 2024

HUMAN GENOME EDITING VIS-À-VIS RIGHT TO HEALTH Read More »